🇱🇻 Latvia vs 🇨🇱 Chile Tariffs — Import Duty Comparison (2026)

🇱🇻

Latvia

EU Deal Rate10%

Section 301N/A

Section 232 (Metals)50%

Trade AgreementNone

Trade Volume$0.6B

Base Effective Rate10%

🇨🇱

Chile

Section 122 Rate12.5%

Section 301N/A

Section 232 (Metals)50%

Trade AgreementUS-Chile FTA

Trade Volume$30B

Base Effective Rate12.5%

🇱🇻 Latvia Advantages

+Lower overall tariff rate (10% vs 12.5%)
+Unique export categories: Timber, Metals, Textiles

🇨🇱 Chile Advantages

+Trade agreement: US-Chile FTA (duty-free on qualifying goods)
+Higher US trade volume ($30B vs $0.6B)
+Unique export categories: Copper, Lithium, Salmon

Comparing import tariffs between Latvia and Chile reveals key differences that can significantly impact landed costs for US importers.

Chile has a lower effective tariff rate (12.5%) compared to Latvia (15%), a difference of 2.5%.

These countries have largely distinct export profiles to the United States, serving different market segments.

In terms of trade volume, Latvia accounts for approximately $0.6B in bilateral trade with the US, compared to Chile's $30B.

Latvia is an EU member and trades under the EU-US deal effective July 1, 2026 — a 10% net of Column 1 for ordinary goods (15% only in lieu of Section 232 for autos, qualifying semiconductor articles, and drones) ceiling with no stacking. Chile is subject to the Section 301 forced-labor tariff that replaced the flat 10% Section 122 rate on July 24, 2026 — a two-tier 10%/12.5% duty on roughly 60 economies, broader than the earlier 46-country proposal.

Latvia's advantages include: Lower overall tariff rate (10% vs 12.5%); Unique export categories: Timber, Metals, Textiles. Chile's advantages include: Trade agreement: US-Chile FTA (duty-free on qualifying goods); Higher US trade volume ($30B vs $0.6B); Unique export categories: Copper, Lithium, Salmon.

For most product categories, Chile currently offers lower import costs due to its tariff advantage. However, importers should consider factors beyond tariffs including shipping costs, lead times, quality standards, and supply chain reliability.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which has lower tariffs — Latvia or Chile?

Chile has a lower effective tariff rate (12.5% vs 15%). The gap reflects the EU's 15% deal ceiling versus the 10%/12.5% forced-labor tariff on non-EU countries.

Should I switch sourcing from Latvia to Chile?

The decision depends on more than tariff rates. Consider total landed cost (shipping, insurance, customs fees), lead times, quality standards, minimum order quantities, and supply chain reliability. The 2.5% tariff difference is significant but not the only factor. Also weigh durability: the EU's 15% deal rate has no expiry, while non-EU origins pay the Section 301 forced-labor tariff (10% or 12.5% by tier) that replaced Section 122 on July 24, 2026.

Do both Latvia and Chile face the same base tariff?

No — they are under different regimes as of July 1, 2026. Latvia (EU) trades under the EU-US deal's 10% net of Column 1 for ordinary goods (15% only in lieu of Section 232 for autos, qualifying semiconductor articles, and drones) ceiling, which has no expiration date. Chile is subject to the Section 301 forced-labor tariff that replaced the flat 10% Section 122 rate on July 24, 2026 — a two-tier 10%/12.5% duty on roughly 60 economies.

What products overlap between Latvia and Chile exports to the US?

Both countries export various products to the US. Latvia has total bilateral trade of ~$0.6B while Chile has ~$30B.