🇭🇰 Hong Kong vs 🇨🇱 Chile Tariffs — Import Duty Comparison (2026)

Comparing import tariffs between Hong Kong and Chile reveals key differences that can significantly impact landed costs for US importers.

Chile has a lower effective tariff rate (12.5%) compared to Hong Kong (37.5%), a difference of 25%.

These countries have largely distinct export profiles to the United States, serving different market segments.

In terms of trade volume, Hong Kong accounts for approximately $45B in bilateral trade with the US, exceeding Chile's $30B.

Both countries are subject to the Section 301 forced-labor tariff that replaced the flat 10% Section 122 rate on July 24, 2026 — a two-tier 10%/12.5% duty on roughly 60 economies (about 99.4% of US imports by value), broader than the earlier 46-country proposal. Section 122 had itself replaced the IEEPA tariffs struck down by the Supreme Court. In August 2026, 25 states sued to block the forced-labor tariff, but CBP continues collecting it while the case proceeds.

Hong Kong's advantages include: Higher US trade volume ($45B vs $30B); Unique export categories: Jewelry, Electronics, Precious metals. Chile's advantages include: Lower overall tariff rate (12.5% vs 37.5%); Trade agreement: US-Chile FTA (duty-free on qualifying goods); Not subject to Section 301 tariffs (China-specific); Unique export categories: Copper, Lithium, Salmon.

For most product categories, Chile currently offers lower import costs due to its tariff advantage. However, importers should consider factors beyond tariffs including shipping costs, lead times, quality standards, and supply chain reliability.