🇳🇴 Norway vs 🇨🇱 Chile Tariffs — Import Duty Comparison (2026)

When choosing between Norway and Chile as import sources, US businesses must weigh tariff rates, trade agreements, product availability, and supply chain logistics.

Both countries face the same base tariff rate of 10% on most goods entering the United States.

These countries have largely distinct export profiles to the United States, serving different market segments.

In terms of trade volume, Norway accounts for approximately $10B in bilateral trade with the US, compared to Chile's $30B.

Both countries are subject to the Section 301 forced-labor tariff that replaced the flat 10% Section 122 rate on July 24, 2026 — a two-tier 10%/12.5% duty on roughly 60 economies (about 99.4% of US imports by value), broader than the earlier 46-country proposal. Section 122 had itself replaced the IEEPA tariffs struck down by the Supreme Court. In August 2026, 25 states sued to block the forced-labor tariff, but CBP continues collecting it while the case proceeds.

Norway's advantages include: Unique export categories: Crude oil, Fish, Aluminum. Chile's advantages include: Trade agreement: US-Chile FTA (duty-free on qualifying goods); Higher US trade volume ($30B vs $10B); Unique export categories: Copper, Lithium, Salmon.

With equivalent base tariff rates, the choice between Norway and Chile depends primarily on product-specific duties, shipping costs, lead times, and supply chain considerations rather than the base tariff rate.