The Pattern Is Repeating
The Legal Timeline — IEEPA Tariffs (2025):
- May 28, 2025: CIT rules IEEPA tariffs unlawful
- June 10, 2025: Federal Circuit pauses CIT ruling — tariffs keep collecting
- February 20, 2026: Supreme Court strikes down IEEPA tariffs
- Result: $166 billion in refunds ordered
The Legal Timeline — Section 122 Tariffs (2026):
- May 7, 2026: CIT rules Section 122 tariffs unlawful
- May 12, 2026: Federal Circuit pauses CIT ruling — tariffs keep collecting
- Expected: Supreme Court review on the merits
- Likely result: Section 122 refunds added to the pool
The pattern is identical. The government even admitted in court filings that “thousands of other importers” would sue if the ruling stood.
“The government’s own lawyers are telling the appeals court that thousands of importers would flood the trade court with lawsuits if Section 122 refunds become available. That’s not a legal strategy. That’s an admission of what’s coming.”
Calculate Your Combined Refund Before the Pattern Plays Out
60 seconds. Free. Estimate emailed in 5 minutes.
Where did you import from?
Pick the country — we’ll calculate your refund rate.
On the afternoon of May 12, 2026, the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit issued a brief order pausing the Court of International Trade's May 7 ruling against Section 122 tariffs. In plain English: the 10% global tariff is back in effect — even for the three plaintiffs who won relief at trial. Importers are still paying. Nothing changed in practical terms. But the legal pattern that just started is the exact same pattern that played out with IEEPA in 2025 — and that pattern ended in February 2026 with the Supreme Court killing the tariffs and $166 billion in refunds ordered. The Section 122 stay is step one of the same playbook. Smart importers are positioning now.
What Just Happened in Court
On the afternoon of May 12, 2026, the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit issued a brief order that did exactly what the Trump administration asked: it paused the Court of International Trade's May 7 ruling against Section 122 tariffs.
In plain English: the 10% global tariff is back in effect — even for the three plaintiffs who won relief at trial.
The court called it an "administrative stay" — a procedural pause while it considers whether to grant a longer-term stay during the full appeal. Both sides must file briefs within a week.
Importers are still paying the 10% tariff. Nothing changed in practical terms.
The Federal Circuit's order is procedural — not a ruling on the merits. It tells you nothing about who wins the appeal. But it tells you everything about which playbook the government is running.
But Here's the Pattern That Tells You What's Next
The Federal Circuit did the exact same thing to the IEEPA ruling on June 10, 2025. Eight months later, the Supreme Court struck the tariffs down anyway.
This isn't speculation. This is legal history repeating itself in real time.
THE IEEPA TIMELINE (2025-2026):
- April 2, 2025: Trump invokes IEEPA to impose reciprocal tariffs
- May 28, 2025: CIT rules tariffs unlawful (V.O.S. Selections v. Trump)
- June 10, 2025: Federal Circuit grants administrative stay — government keeps collecting
- July 31, 2025: Federal Circuit oral arguments
- December 2025: Federal Circuit affirms CIT ruling
- February 20, 2026: Supreme Court strikes down IEEPA tariffs as unconstitutional
- April 20, 2026: CAPE refund portal opens
- May 11, 2026: First refunds hit bank accounts
THE SECTION 122 TIMELINE (2026):
- February 24, 2026: Trump invokes Section 122 to impose 10% global tariff
- May 7, 2026: CIT rules tariffs unlawful (Oregon v. Trump and Burlap & Barrel v. Trump)
- May 12, 2026: Federal Circuit grants administrative stay — government keeps collecting
- Expected June-August 2026: Federal Circuit oral arguments
- Possible late 2026 - early 2027: Federal Circuit ruling
- Possible 2027: Supreme Court review
The two timelines are functionally identical. Same court structure. Same legal arguments. Same government delay tactics. And the same likely endpoint.
The Government's Own Admission
In its motion for the administrative stay, the Department of Justice argued something extraordinary: that allowing the broader judgment to stand would "spur the thousands of other importers who have been paying them so far to flood the trade court with their own lawsuits."
Translation: the government's lawyers expect to lose. They know thousands of importers would sue immediately if they thought refunds were coming. The DOJ is using procedural delay tactics — not merits arguments — to keep tariff collection going.
The government's own lawyers are telling the appeals court that thousands of importers would flood the trade court with lawsuits if Section 122 refunds become available. That's not a legal strategy. That's an admission of what's coming.
This is the same playbook DOJ ran on IEEPA in 2025. And we know how that ended.
The Numbers That Matter Now
WHAT'S ALREADY REFUNDABLE (IEEPA):
- $166 billion in unconstitutional duties
- 330,000 importers eligible
- 53 million entries affected
- First refunds confirmed paid May 11, 2026
- 21% of CAPE submissions accepted to date
WHAT'S POTENTIALLY REFUNDABLE (SECTION 122):
- ~$50 billion in 10% global tariffs collected since February 24
- Tariffs continue to accrue at approximately $10 billion per month
- Set to expire July 24, 2026 automatically (statutory limit)
- Refunds NOT automatic — importers must preserve rights through:
- Filing CIT lawsuits
- Submitting CBP protests within 180 days of liquidation
- Joining existing class actions
THE COMBINED OPPORTUNITY:
- IEEPA refunds: $166 billion (automatic via CAPE)
- Section 122 refunds: $50 billion+ (if pattern holds)
- Section 301 challenges: pending in CIT
- Total potential refund pool: $200+ billion
What Smart Importers Are Doing This Week
The importers who got the first IEEPA refunds on May 11 weren't lucky. They were prepared. The pattern says Section 122 refunds are coming — but only for importers who preserved their rights now.
The importers who positioned during the June 2025 IEEPA stay were the same importers who got paid first in May 2026. The ones who waited for certainty are still waiting in queue.
The window between an administrative stay and a Supreme Court ruling is the position-taking window. It's where the IEEPA winners did their work in summer 2025. It's where Section 122 winners are doing their work now.
Calculate Your Total Refund Exposure — Free in 60 Seconds
IEEPA + Section 122. We email the breakdown in 5 minutes.
Where did you import from?
Pick the country — we’ll calculate your refund rate.
The Two-Track Strategy
TRACK 1 — CLAIM YOUR IEEPA REFUNDS NOW (the easy money)
The legal fight is over. The Supreme Court ruled in February. CBP is actively paying refunds through the CAPE portal.
What needs to happen:
- File your CAPE Declaration through ACE
- Verify ACH banking is enrolled
- Track entry status through the REV-615 report
- Resolve any rejection errors before 80-day windows close
- For refunds over $250,000: get pre-filing professional audit
This is the $166 billion pool. Most of it is unclaimed. First refunds paid this week proved the system works.
TRACK 2 — PRESERVE YOUR SECTION 122 RIGHTS (the bigger fight)
Unlike IEEPA, Section 122 refunds require active preservation. The Federal Circuit's pause doesn't change that — but it does mean you have time to position properly.
What needs to happen:
- Document every entry with Section 122 duties paid (since February 24, 2026)
- File formal protests with CBP within 180 days of liquidation for those entries
- Consider joining class action filings being organized by trade attorneys
- For Section 122 exposure over $500,000: file individual CIT lawsuit to preserve rights
The deadline matters. Section 122 expires July 24 anyway. Any pending appeal could resolve before then. The importers who position now will be in line for refunds when the pattern completes.
The BRICS Complication
While Section 122 was the headline this week, Trump's broader tariff strategy continues unfolding. The administration has implemented or threatened tariffs on countries doing business with BRICS members:
- 25% secondary tariff on countries buying Iranian oil (active)
- 25% framework for countries buying Russian oil (suspended for India, active for others)
- 25% secondary tariff on countries buying Venezuelan oil (active)
- Cuban oil tariffs signed January 29
- Section 301 investigations launched March 12 on 60+ countries
Each new tariff scheme follows the same pattern: executive action → court challenge → legal limbo → potential refunds.
For US importers, the lesson is clear: the Trump administration's aggressive tariff posture has produced more refund opportunities than any administration in modern history. The question isn't whether you'll be owed money. The question is whether you'll claim it.
What the Next 60 Days Will Reveal
KEY DATES TO WATCH:
- May 19, 2026: Briefs due in Federal Circuit on Section 122 stay
- May 26, 2026: Federal Circuit decides on longer-term stay pending appeal
- Early June 2026: Government's IEEPA appeal deadline approaches
- June-July 2026: Federal Circuit Section 122 oral arguments expected
- July 24, 2026: Section 122 tariffs expire automatically (statutory limit)
- Late 2026: Federal Circuit Section 122 ruling expected
By the time Section 122 tariffs expire on July 24, the legal picture will be much clearer. Importers who positioned now will be ready. Everyone else will be playing catch-up.
The Bottom Line
You don't have to predict the future. You have to look at the past. IEEPA refunds came after the same procedural sequence Section 122 just entered. The pattern is the playbook.
The Federal Circuit paused IEEPA in June 2025. Refunds came anyway — $166 billion of them.
The Federal Circuit paused Section 122 yesterday. The pattern says refunds will come — $50 billion or more.
The importers who file IEEPA refunds today and preserve Section 122 rights this week are building toward a refund position that could exceed $200 billion across the entire system.
The window is open. The pattern is clear. The action is yours.
Key Takeaway
On May 12, 2026, the Federal Circuit paused the Court of International Trade's ruling against Trump's Section 122 10% global tariff — the exact same procedural move the same court ran on IEEPA tariffs on June 10, 2025. Eight months after that IEEPA stay, the Supreme Court struck the tariffs down and $166 billion in refunds was ordered. The Section 122 timeline now sits at step one of the same legal pattern. The government's own lawyers told the Federal Circuit that thousands of importers would flood the trade court with lawsuits if Section 122 refunds become available — an admission, not a strategy. For US importers, the two-track move is simple: file IEEPA refunds now through CAPE while the money is flowing, and preserve Section 122 rights this week through CBP protests or class action filings. The combined refund pool exceeds $200 billion. The pattern is the playbook.
The pattern is the playbook. Position before it plays out.
$166B in IEEPA refunds underway. $50B+ in Section 122 refunds in the pipeline. Calculate your combined exposure in 60 seconds, or get help filing for refunds over $250K.
See also: Section 122 ruled illegal May 7 · Iran war impact on importers · Trump-Xi meeting and China refunds